Provided by Google Translate
Provided by Google Translate

Fighting for Trash Free Seas®

Ending the flow of trash at the source

International Plastics Agreement

Working towards a legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution

Global plastic production and consumption has grown exponentially since the 1950s, with global plastics production projected to reach roughly 450 million tons in 2025. All this plastic waste is creating a crisis for our ocean and planet. An estimated 11 million metric tons of plastics enter the ocean every year from land-based sources. In the absence of drastic intervention, scientists predict a nearly three-fold increase of ocean plastic inputs totaling 29 million metric tons annually by 2040.

In March 2022, the international community under the United Nations Environmental Assembly (UNEA) agreed to a resolution named: “End plastic pollution: Toward an internationally legally binding instrument,” which represents the first major global effort to address the plastic pollution crisis. This historic resolution is a triumph and the first major step in addressing the plastic pollution crisis.

A legally binding instrument is an enforceable agreement between countries. It is an important tool to tackle a global challenge like plastic pollution, as we highlighted in this United Nations’ publication. In this case, the instrument under development can inform national environmental laws and policies governing the production, use and recycling or disposal of plastic products worldwide.

Fifth Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5)

INC-5 took place from November 25 – December 1, 2024 in Busan, South Korea. Ocean Conservancy was there to advise negotiators crafting this historic, once-in-a-generation opportunity to create a future where we leave the ocean cleaner than we found it. In advance of the negotiations, the Chair released a new draft text (referred to as the “non-paper”) to serve as the likely basis for negotiations moving forward. While Ocean Conservancy appreciates all the work to get to this point and streamline efforts, we have serious concerns about the lack of ambition currently reflected in the draft. In response, Ocean Conservancy prepared recommendations based on the non-paper to help steer negotiators towards an ambitious outcome to protect our ocean and the communities that depend on it.  

An Opportunity to End Plastic Pollution

There are many considerations that will go into the development of this agreement. Ocean Conservancy, as a leader on international efforts to combat ocean plastics, is working with governments and other key collaborators to ensure the agreement addresses the full lifecycle of plastics.

We believe that an effective agreement should include the crucial policies and considerations listed below:

1. Source Reduction of Plastics

The science is clear: to address our plastic pollution crisis we must reduce the amount of plastic we produce and use. Eliminating some plastic items, such as unnecessary single-use plastics, would result in a significant reduction in plastic production (packaging represents 40% of plastic production annually), decrease contamination in the waste stream and would improve the health of our ocean by reducing the items that most commonly pollute the environment.

Plastic water bottle sits on the sand

2. Include Ghost Gear

Abandoned, lost or discarded fishing gear (ALDFG, also known as “ghost gear”) is the largest source of plastic pollution in our ocean. Ghost gear has direct and crucial implications for global food security, fisheries sustainability, biodiversity preservation, coastal economies, and human health and livelihoods. To help support the negotiations, the Global Ghost Gear Initiative published a white paper that lays out key policies for consideration to include in the plastics treaty to address this issue across the full lifecycle of fishing gear and aquaculture gear.

3. Address Microplastics

Addressing microplastics should also be a priority as it is the most pervasive, mobile and easily distributed type of plastic pollution. We need to prioritize both elimination of primary microplastics (plastics intentionally produced at a small size fraction, such as cosmetic beads and glitter) and put in place policies to address known sources of secondary microplastics (those microplastics that are a result of fragmenting or shredding of larger plastic items such as synthetic fibers, hard fragments, tire wear particles and paint flakes).

4. Design for Circularity

It is important that we ensure plastic products that are deemed necessary are designed to be circular, which means they are intended to be reused (ideally hundreds of times) or effectively recycled. Ocean Conservancy data shows that nearly 70% of plastics collected every year in the International Coastal Cleanup® are not recyclable. Upstream design is critical to facilitate collection, sorting and reuse. The current chemical or advanced recycling technologies are not a circular approach to plastics recycling because they do not transform plastics back into plastics (but into fuel) and create additional environmental and social harms.

Crab inside of a piece of plastic

5. Inclusion of Informal Sector Waste Collectors

Although ocean plastic pollution is a global challenge, its solution requires local action. Informal waste collectors or “waste pickers” are the frontline in the fight against (ocean) plastic pollution in many low-to-middle income economies. Informal sector waste collectors must be included in conversations about global system changes and their expertise incorporated to ensure national-level actions are just, inclusive and effective.

Download Ocean Conservancy’s vision for a strong international agreement on plastics:

We Can End the Plastic Pollution Crisis

The global plastics treaty is a shot at a better future for our ocean and we can’t miss. Take action now to support this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to end the plastic pollution crisis.

Resources

Supporting international efforts to combat ocean plastics

Fact Sheets

INC Submissions

Review Ocean Conservancy’s official submissions to the secretariat as part of the ILBI negotiation process:

More Information

Top
Back to Top Up Arrow